Permanent links

Daily links

  • BBC's Conservation now: Global Top Ten
  • Ultimate Frisbee
  • The Wondering Minstrels
  • Open Poetry Project
  • Today in Literature
  • the Literary Saloon
  • Language Log
  • Double-Tongued Word Wrester
  • Lonely Planet
  • Calvinball: Règle du jeu
  • CC Weblog
  • Poems of the fantastic and macabre
  • The Republic of Pemberley
  • BBC's World Forum: Water
  • Caltech/Pasadena vs. UIUC/Urbana
  • Guide to Squash
  • Chronology of the Second World War
  • Masters of Cinema
  • A Prairie Home Companion
  • Capitol Steps
  • Folkstreams.net
  • BBC Radio 3
  • del.icio.us
  • Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal
  • Daniel W. Drezner
  • Sangeetham
  • Set
  • Miscellaneous writings
  • Movies watched
  • (Blogger version)
  • Journal archives
  • Journal permanent links
  • Main page
  • Journal sitefeed RSS 1.0 Entries

    Movies sitefeed
    Atom Entries

    del.icio.us sitefeed
    RSS

    8 December 2004

    US Foreign Policy: An enlightening speech

    The bombastically appellated Caltech Great Decisions Foreign Policy Discussion group hosted Stanley J. Michalak, professor of government at the Franklin and Marshall College who delivered a very insightful speech on United States foreign policy. Prof. Michalak characterised the different classes and beliefs prevalent in the history of United States foreign policy. There are the liberal internationalists, comprising mainly of the Democrats like Bill Clinton, John Kerry etc. who swear by collective security and multilateralism. The problem with liberal internationalism is that of conflicts between justice and power -- take for instance the hypothetical scenario when China or North Korea indulged in an act of aggression. In such a case, it is impossible to launch an attack at either country keeping in mind the balance of power both countries have brought about by way of a nuclear deterrent. Similarly, there are problems related to conflicts between justice and costs. The liberal internationalists are however guided by some moral values and universal principles whereas the political realists comprising of George Kennan, Henry Kissinger, George H. W. Bush are more pragmatic of the situation and believe more in tact and diplomacy than in explicit theosophical preferences. They seek to avoid the crusading spirit (e.g. typifying the Muslim nations so blanketedly) and empathise with their enemy. Political realism suffers from the plight of being branded as unAmericanism. There are those who believe in intervention and pre-emption but are not averse to unilateral action. This includes George W. Bush, Richard Perle, John Bolton etc. There are also the neo-isolationists like Pat Buchanan and others who believe in no intervention at all. The flaws with this however pertain to increased nuclear proliferation and uncertainty in involving the United States back into the picture once it opts out.

    Prof. Michalak combined a thorough grasp of facts with his quick wit and without revealing his own preferences and favourite foreign policy philosophy regaled us all with his most enjoyable speech.
  • Required reading for the liberal internationlists: Foreign Policy
  • Required reading for the unilateralists: National Review
  • Required reading for the political realists: The Weekly Standard




  • April 2004
  • January 2004 - March 2004
  • October 2003 - January 2004
  • July 2003 - October 2003
  • May 2003 - June 2003
  • April 2003
  • January 2003 - April 2003
  • 2002




  • Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.